Beijing Great Wall - Guangdong Vermilion Birds | Statistics | StatsHub

Matchday 7

|

31

Dec,2016

shadow

highlight

shadow

highlight

Limited coverage

Ended

81

:

47

20

/ 100

Overall Form

40

/ 100

L

-10

L

-16

+5

W

L

-19

L

-9

WDL Direction

L

-4

+7

W

+34

W

L

-1

L

-10

WDL Direction

Group Table

Group 1

#	Team	P	W	L	PF	DIFF	Basket ratio	pct	Points
1	Beijing	12	10	2	967-708	259	1.366	0.833	22
2	Shanghai Baoshan Dahua Swordfish	12	8	4	916-871	45	1.052	0.667	20
3	Guangdong	12	6	6	857-847	10	1.012	0.5	18
4	Henan Phoenix	12	0	12	729-1043	-314	0.699	0	12

Group 2

#	Team	P	W	L	PF	DIFF	Basket ratio	pct	Points
1	Tianshan	12	9	3	1018-928	90	1.097	0.75	21
2	Shenbu Wancheng	12	8	4	933-899	34	1.038	0.667	20
3	Bayi Kylins	12	4	8	901-926	-25	0.973	0.333	16
4	Shanxi Flame	12	3	9	887-986	-99	0.9	0.25	15

Group 3

#	Team	P	W	L	PF	DIFF	Basket ratio	pct	Points
1	Heilongjiang Dragons	12	10	2	889-807	82	1.102	0.833	22
2	Liaoning Arctic Wolves	12	8	4	921-877	44	1.05	0.667	20
3	Sichuan	12	4	8	832-907	-75	0.917	0.333	16
4	Shandong	12	2	10	924-975	-51	0.948	0.167	14

Group A

#	Team	P	W	L	PF	DIFF	Basket ratio	pct	Points
1	Shanghai Baoshan Dahua Swordfish	10	8	2	784-720	64	1.089	0.8	18
2	Beijing	10	7	3	806-679	127	1.187	0.7	17
3	Guangdong	10	4	6	717-719	-2	0.997	0.4	14
4	Henan Phoenix	10	4	6	748-820	-72	0.912	0.4	14
5	Shenbu Wancheng	10	4	6	795-827	-32	0.961	0.4	14
6	Shanxi Flame	10	3	7	758-843	-85	0.899	0.3	13

Group B

#	Team	P	W	L	PF	DIFF	Basket ratio	pct	Points
1	Bayi Kylins	10	9	1	834-709	125	1.176	0.9	19
2	Tianshan	10	8	2	797-695	102	1.147	0.8	18
3	Sichuan	10	5	5	732-754	-22	0.971	0.5	15
4	Heilongjiang Dragons	10	4	6	731-764	-33	0.957	0.4	14
5	Liaoning Arctic Wolves	10	3	7	747-790	-43	0.946	0.3	13
6	Shandong	10	1	9	668-797	-129	0.838	0.1	11

North

#	Team	P	W	L	PF	DIFF	Basket ratio	pct	Points
1	Shanxi Flame	10	8	2	833-767	66	1.086	0.8	18
2	Shenbu Wancheng	10	7	3	736-732	4	1.005	0.7	17
3	Beijing	10	6	4	798-754	44	1.058	0.6	16
4	Liaoning Arctic Wolves	10	3	7	767-784	-17	0.978	0.3	13
5	Heilongjiang Dragons	10	3	7	700-765	-65	0.915	0.3	13
6	Tianshan	10	3	7	775-807	-32	0.96	0.3	13

South

#	Team	P	W	L	PF	DIFF	Basket ratio	pct	Points
1	Henan Phoenix	10	8	2	836-762	74	1.097	0.8	18
2	Shanghai Baoshan Dahua Swordfish	10	7	3	792-702	90	1.128	0.7	17
3	Guangdong	10	6	4	758-706	52	1.074	0.6	16
4	Bayi Kylins	10	6	4	733-746	-13	0.983	0.6	16
5	Sichuan	10	2	8	731-813	-82	0.899	0.2	12
6	Shandong	10	1	9	702-823	-121	0.853	0.1	11

Season form

Beijing

shadow

highlight

100‏%

Form

+14

W

+9

W

+35

W

+17

W

+19

W

WDL Direction

Guangdong

shadow

highlight

60‏%

Form

+25

W

+30

W

L

-20

+9

W

L

-8

WDL Direction

Position by Round

Beijing

Guangdong

Last matches- Beijing

Apr 01, 2026
Beijing
Dalian Wenti
‌
68
‌
77
T
L

Mar 29, 2026
Dalian Wenti
Beijing
‌
91
‌
72
T
L

Feb 01, 2026|
Matchday 1
Beijing
Jiangsu Phoenix
‌
83
‌
78
T
W

Jan 30, 2026|
Matchday 1
Beijing
Shandong
‌
72
‌
88
T
L

Jan 28, 2026|
Matchday 1
Hebei
Beijing
‌
91
‌
81
T
L

Jan 23, 2026|
Matchday 1
Shanxi Flame
Beijing
‌
82
‌
68
T
L

FixturesFixtures

Last matches- Guangdong

Mar 30, 2026|
Quarterfinals
Jiangsu Phoenix
Guangdong
‌
83
‌
73
T
L

Mar 27, 2026|
Quarterfinals
Guangdong
Jiangsu Phoenix
‌
85
‌
86
T
L

Feb 01, 2026|
Matchday 1
Guangdong
Shaanxi Tianze
‌
104
‌
70
T
W

Jan 30, 2026|
Matchday 1
Hebei
Guangdong
‌
76
‌
83
T
W

Jan 27, 2026|
Matchday 1
Guangdong
Shanxi Flame
‌
79
‌
83
T
L

Jan 23, 2026|
Matchday 1
Guangdong
Tianshan
‌
82
‌
85
T
L

FixturesFixtures

Next matches - Beijing

China WCBA, Placement 9-16

shadow

highlight

Apr 3, 202607:30

shadow

highlight

MatchesMDR

Apr 03, 2026
Beijing
Dalian Wenti
T

FixturesFixtures

Next matches - Guangdong

No matches available

FixturesFixtures

Over/Under

	BGW	GVB
Over 125.5	90‏% 80.52	92‏% 72.62
Over 145.5	48‏% 80.52	49‏% 72.62
Over 165.5	12‏% 80.52	8‏% 72.62
Over 185.5	0‏% 80.52	0‏% 72.62
Over 200.5	0‏% 80.52	0‏% 72.62
Over 225.5	0‏% 80.52	0‏% 72.62
Under 125.5	10‏% 80.52	8‏% 72.62
Under 145.5	52‏% 80.52	51‏% 72.62
Under 165.5	88‏% 80.52	92‏% 72.62
Under 185.5	100‏% 80.52	100‏% 72.62
Under 200.5	100‏% 80.52	100‏% 72.62
Under 225.5	100‏% 80.52	100‏% 72.62