Group Table
EXQI League, Playoffs
# | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | DIFF | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Roeselare | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 16 | WWWDW |
2 | Geel | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 7 | 11 | DLWDW |
3 | Royal Antwerp | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 14 | -8 | 4 | LWLDL |
4 | Beveren | 6 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 12 | -8 | 2 | DLLDL |
EXQI League
# | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | DIFF | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Zulte Waregem | 34 | 22 | 7 | 5 | 71 | 35 | 36 | 73 | WLWLW |
2 | Roeselare | 34 | 16 | 12 | 6 | 51 | 31 | 20 | 60 | WWWDW |
3 | Geel | 34 | 16 | 8 | 10 | 49 | 36 | 13 | 56 | DLWDW |
4 | Royal Antwerp | 34 | 15 | 5 | 14 | 48 | 40 | 8 | 50 | LWLDL |
5 | Beveren | 34 | 14 | 8 | 12 | 51 | 55 | -4 | 50 | DLLDL |
6 | Kortrijk | 34 | 13 | 9 | 12 | 56 | 48 | 8 | 48 | WDDWW |
7 | Tubize-Braine | 34 | 14 | 6 | 14 | 54 | 49 | 5 | 48 | LDDLL |
8 | Ronse | 34 | 13 | 9 | 12 | 42 | 51 | -9 | 48 | LDLWL |
9 | Heusden Zolder | 34 | 12 | 11 | 11 | 41 | 41 | 0 | 47 | LWWLW |
10 | Deinze | 34 | 11 | 10 | 13 | 47 | 59 | -12 | 43 | WLDLW |
11 | Eupen | 34 | 9 | 14 | 11 | 52 | 46 | 6 | 41 | DDDDW |
12 | Hamme | 34 | 10 | 11 | 13 | 50 | 47 | 3 | 41 | WWWLL |
13 | Virton | 34 | 10 | 11 | 13 | 43 | 54 | -11 | 41 | LDLWL |
14 | Union Gilloise | 34 | 10 | 9 | 15 | 41 | 53 | -12 | 39 | DDLWL |
15 | Dessel | 34 | 9 | 12 | 13 | 31 | 46 | -15 | 39 | WLLDW |
16 | CS Vise | 34 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 52 | 54 | -2 | 37 | DWWWL |
17 | Maasmechelen | 34 | 9 | 10 | 15 | 35 | 53 | -18 | 37 | DLWLL |
18 | Eendracht Aalst | 34 | 7 | 13 | 14 | 41 | 57 | -16 | 34 | LDLWD |
Season form
Position by Round
Maasmechelen
Roeselare
Last matches- Maasmechelen
Last matches- Roeselare
Next matches - Maasmechelen
MatchesMDR
Last matches
| PMA | ROE | |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Scored at FT | 1 1 / 3 | 3 3 / 3 |
| Matches Scored at HT | 1 1 / 3 | 1 1 / 3 |
| Total Goals | 3.00 | 6.00 |
| Average goals scored | 1.00 3 / 3 | 2.00 6 / 3 |
| Scoring efficiency at HT | 33% 1 / 3 | 33% 1 / 3 |
| Scoring efficiency at FT | 33% 1 / 3 | 100% 3 / 3 |
| Goal margin at victories | 3.00 1W | 2.50 2W |
| Both teams scored | 0% 0 / 3 | 33% 1 / 3 |
| At least one goal | 100% 3 / 3 | 100% 3 / 3 |
| Failed to score | 67% 2 / 3 | 0% 0 / 3 |
| Clean sheets | 33% 1 / 3 | 67% 2 / 3 |
Over/Under
| PMA | ROE | |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 85% 1.03 | 85% 1.5 |
| Over 1.5 | 62% 1.03 | 71% 1.5 |
| Over 2.5 | 50% 1.03 | 44% 1.5 |
| Over 3.5 | 35% 1.03 | 26% 1.5 |
| Over 4.5 | 18% 1.03 | 12% 1.5 |
| Over 5.5 | 6% 1.03 | 3% 1.5 |
| Under 0.5 | 15% 1.03 | 15% 1.5 |
| Under 1.5 | 38% 1.03 | 29% 1.5 |
| Under 2.5 | 50% 1.03 | 56% 1.5 |
| Under 3.5 | 65% 1.03 | 74% 1.5 |
| Under 4.5 | 82% 1.03 | 88% 1.5 |
| Under 5.5 | 94% 1.03 | 97% 1.5 |