Matchday 11
|
30
Nov,2009
Limited coverage
Ended
1
:
0
FT1:0
HT1:0
3
/ 16
League Position
1
/ 16
87
/ 100
Overall Form
67
/ 100

Group Table

Playoff 1-6
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Hapoel Tel Aviv
35259187266149
2
Maccabi Haifa
35283472165649
3
Maccabi Tel Aviv
35179952351734
4
Bnei Yehuda
351411104334931
5
Beitar Jerusalem
35147145044626
6
Ashdod
351110143645-922
Playoff 7-10
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Bnei Sakhnin
33138123131027
2
Maccabi Petah Tikva
331011124447-324
3
Be`er Sheva
331110124955-623
4
Netanya
33109144447-321
Playoff 11-16
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Hapoel Haifa
35109164450-623
2
Hapoel Acre
35714143852-1423
3
H. Petah Tikva
35814132848-2023
4
Ramat Gan Givatayim
35911153449-1522
5
Ra`anana
35610193358-2518
6
Nazareth
3577213381-4816
Toto League
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Maccabi Haifa
30252364125277
2
Hapoel Tel Aviv
30218179255471
3
Maccabi Tel Aviv
30157847331452
4
Beitar Jerusalem
301371046341246
5
Bnei Yehuda
3012993730745
6
Ashdod
30111093231143
7
Bnei Sakhnin
30118112829-141
8
Be`er Sheva
301010104450-640
9
Netanya
3099124140136
10
Maccabi Petah Tikva
30811113743-635
11
Ramat Gan Givatayim
3089132646-2033
12
Hapoel Haifa
3088143945-632
13
H. Petah Tikva
30613112341-1831
14
Hapoel Acre
30413133246-1425
15
Nazareth
3066182767-4024
16
Ra`anana
3048182757-3020

Season form

shadow
highlight

60‏%

Form

shadow
highlight

70‏%

Form

Position by Round

Maccabi Tel Aviv
Maccabi Haifa
Last matches
MTAMAH
Matches Scored at FT
1
3
Matches Scored at HT
1
2
Total Goals
2.00
5.00
Average goals scored
0.67
1.67
Scoring efficiency at HT
33‏%
67‏%
Scoring efficiency at FT
33‏%
100‏%
Goal margin at victories
2.00
1.50
Both teams scored
0‏%
67‏%
At least one goal
67‏%
100‏%
Failed to score
67‏%
0‏%
Clean sheets
67‏%
33‏%

Over/Under

MTAMAH
Over 0.5
89‏%
1.49
94‏%
2.06
Over 1.5
63‏%
1.49
69‏%
2.06
Over 2.5
40‏%
1.49
51‏%
2.06
Over 3.5
31‏%
1.49
26‏%
2.06
Over 4.5
14‏%
1.49
11‏%
2.06
Over 5.5
9‏%
1.49
0‏%
2.06
Under 0.5
11‏%
1.49
6‏%
2.06
Under 1.5
37‏%
1.49
31‏%
2.06
Under 2.5
60‏%
1.49
49‏%
2.06
Under 3.5
69‏%
1.49
74‏%
2.06
Under 4.5
86‏%
1.49
89‏%
2.06
Under 5.5
91‏%
1.49
100‏%
2.06