Matchday 24
|
26
Feb,2010
Limited coverage
Ended
4
:
0
FT4:0
HT0:0
67
/ 100
Overall Form
60
/ 100

Group Table

Playoffs 1-6
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Kiryat Shmona
35219551222941
2
Ironi Ashkelon
35151194742534
3
Kfar Saba
35169105647932
4
Ness Ziona
351315745291631
5
Nir Ramat Hasharon
3513111150371327
6
MI Bat Yam
35147144341227
Playoff 7-10
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Hapoel Nof Hagalil
331214738241429
2
H. Rishon Lezion
33137133931826
3
Ahva Arraba
33129123737023
4
M. Herzliya
331012113128322
Playoff 11-16
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Hakoah RG
351114104442228
2
Tel Aviv Bat Yam
351013123147-1627
3
Bnei Lod Rakevet
351015103734326
4
M Beer Sheva
35126174253-1124
5
H Jerusalem
35611184066-2618
6
Hapoel Marmorek
3529242172-518
National League
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Kiryat Shmona
30188443202362
2
Kfar Saba
30149747371051
3
Ness Ziona
301114533211247
4
Nir Ramat Hasharon
301210844271746
5
MI Bat Yam
30136113529645
6
Ironi Ashkelon
30111184135644
7
Hapoel Nof Hagalil
301013734231143
8
Ahva Arraba
30128103532343
9
H. Rishon Lezion
30117123528740
10
M. Herzliya
301010102824440
11
Bnei Lod Rakevet
3091293130139
12
Hakoah RG
30911103639-338
13
M Beer Sheva
30113163749-1236
14
Tel Aviv Bat Yam
30712112742-1533
15
H Jerusalem
3058173561-2623
16
Hapoel Marmorek
3028201963-4414

Season form

shadow
highlight

30‏%

Form

shadow
highlight

10‏%

Form

Position by Round

M. Herzliya
Hapoel Marmorek
Last matches
MHEHMR
Matches Scored at FT
2
1
Matches Scored at HT
0
1
Total Goals
3.00
2.00
Average goals scored
1.00
0.67
Scoring efficiency at HT
0‏%
33‏%
Scoring efficiency at FT
67‏%
33‏%
Goal margin at victories
0.00
0.00
Both teams scored
67‏%
33‏%
At least one goal
67‏%
100‏%
Failed to score
33‏%
67‏%
Clean sheets
33‏%
0‏%

Over/Under

MHEHMR
Over 0.5
76‏%
0.94
91‏%
0.6
Over 1.5
52‏%
0.94
74‏%
0.6
Over 2.5
36‏%
0.94
54‏%
0.6
Over 3.5
12‏%
0.94
31‏%
0.6
Over 4.5
3‏%
0.94
11‏%
0.6
Over 5.5
0‏%
0.94
3‏%
0.6
Under 0.5
24‏%
0.94
9‏%
0.6
Under 1.5
48‏%
0.94
26‏%
0.6
Under 2.5
64‏%
0.94
46‏%
0.6
Under 3.5
88‏%
0.94
69‏%
0.6
Under 4.5
97‏%
0.94
89‏%
0.6
Under 5.5
100‏%
0.94
97‏%
0.6