Matchday 8
|
11
Oct,2019
Limited coverage
Ended
1
:
2
FT1:2
HT1:1
67
/ 100
Overall Form
13
/ 100

Group Table

Playoffs 1-8
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Maccabi Petah Tikva
37218866372971
2
Bnei Sakhnin
371910860322867
3
Ramat Gan Givatayim
371791151361560
4
Hapoel Jerusalem
371611104233959
5
H. Rishon Lezion
371610114943658
6
FC Kafr Qasim
37168135348556
7
Tel Aviv Bat Yam
37157155154-352
8
Nir Ramat Hasharon
37147165060-1049
National League
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Maccabi Petah Tikva
30197462283464
2
H. Rishon Lezion
30159643291454
3
Hapoel Jerusalem
3014793730749
4
Bnei Sakhnin
30139846301648
5
Nir Ramat Hasharon
30137104243-146
6
Ramat Gan Givatayim
30128103729844
7
FC Kafr Qasim
30128104140144
8
Tel Aviv Bat Yam
30127114040043
9
Hapoel Umm AL Fahm
30109113538-339
10
H. Petah Tikva
30911104243-138
11
Hapoel Nof Hagalil
30910113637-137
12
Hapoel Acre
30810122427-334
13
Nazareth
30710133142-1131
14
Bnei Lod Rakevet
3075182659-3326
15
Ironi Ashkelon
3096153138-724
16
Hapoel Afula
30411152141-2023
Playoffs 9-16
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Hapoel Umm AL Fahm
361310134544149
2
H. Petah Tikva
361211135254-247
3
Hapoel Nof Hagalil
371112144548-345
4
Hapoel Acre
371013143032-243
5
Nazareth
371013144248-643
6
Hapoel Afula
37812173654-1836
7
Bnei Lod Rakevet
3596203469-3533
8
Ironi Ashkelon
3799193751-1427

Season form

shadow
highlight

60‏%

Form

shadow
highlight

90‏%

Form

Position by Round

Nazareth
Bnei Sakhnin
Last matches
MANBNS
Matches Scored at FT
2
2
Matches Scored at HT
1
2
Total Goals
3.00
6.00
Average goals scored
1.00
2.00
Scoring efficiency at HT
33‏%
67‏%
Scoring efficiency at FT
67‏%
67‏%
Goal margin at victories
2.00
3.00
Both teams scored
33‏%
0‏%
At least one goal
67‏%
67‏%
Failed to score
33‏%
33‏%
Clean sheets
67‏%
100‏%

Over/Under

MANBNS
Over 0.5
84‏%
1.14
89‏%
1.62
Over 1.5
68‏%
1.14
76‏%
1.62
Over 2.5
41‏%
1.14
54‏%
1.62
Over 3.5
22‏%
1.14
19‏%
1.62
Over 4.5
16‏%
1.14
8‏%
1.62
Over 5.5
14‏%
1.14
3‏%
1.62
Under 0.5
16‏%
1.14
11‏%
1.62
Under 1.5
32‏%
1.14
24‏%
1.62
Under 2.5
59‏%
1.14
46‏%
1.62
Under 3.5
78‏%
1.14
81‏%
1.62
Under 4.5
84‏%
1.14
92‏%
1.62
Under 5.5
86‏%
1.14
97‏%
1.62