Table|League Two
# | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | DIFF | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Carlisle | 46 | 25 | 11 | 10 | 84 | 42 | 42 | 86 | WDLWD |
2 | Northampton | 46 | 22 | 17 | 7 | 63 | 37 | 26 | 83 | WWWWD |
3 | Leyton Orient | 46 | 22 | 15 | 9 | 67 | 51 | 16 | 81 | WDDWW |
4 | Grimsby | 46 | 22 | 12 | 12 | 64 | 44 | 20 | 78 | DDWDD |
5 | Cheltenham | 46 | 19 | 15 | 12 | 65 | 53 | 12 | 72 | WDLWW |
6 | Wycombe | 46 | 18 | 17 | 11 | 72 | 56 | 16 | 71 | LLWLW |
7 | Lincoln | 46 | 15 | 21 | 10 | 65 | 53 | 12 | 66 | DWDWD |
8 | Darlington | 46 | 16 | 15 | 15 | 58 | 52 | 6 | 63 | LDLWD |
9 | Peterborough | 46 | 17 | 11 | 18 | 57 | 49 | 8 | 62 | LLWLL |
10 | Shrewsbury | 46 | 16 | 13 | 17 | 55 | 55 | 0 | 61 | DWLLW |
11 | Boston | 46 | 15 | 16 | 15 | 50 | 60 | -10 | 61 | WWLWD |
12 | Bristol Rovers | 46 | 17 | 9 | 20 | 59 | 67 | -8 | 60 | DLWLL |
13 | Wrexham | 46 | 15 | 14 | 17 | 61 | 54 | 7 | 59 | LWLDD |
14 | Rochdale | 46 | 14 | 14 | 18 | 66 | 69 | -3 | 56 | DDWLD |
15 | Chester | 46 | 14 | 12 | 20 | 53 | 59 | -6 | 54 | WDDLL |
16 | Mansfield | 46 | 13 | 15 | 18 | 59 | 66 | -7 | 54 | LLDDL |
17 | Macclesfield | 46 | 12 | 18 | 16 | 60 | 71 | -11 | 54 | DLLDW |
18 | Barnet | 46 | 12 | 18 | 16 | 44 | 57 | -13 | 54 | WDDDW |
19 | Bury | 46 | 12 | 17 | 17 | 45 | 57 | -12 | 53 | DDWDD |
20 | Torquay | 46 | 13 | 13 | 20 | 53 | 66 | -13 | 52 | WWWWD |
21 | Notts | 46 | 12 | 16 | 18 | 48 | 63 | -15 | 52 | DLDLD |
22 | Stockport | 46 | 11 | 19 | 16 | 57 | 78 | -21 | 52 | LWLDD |
23 | Oxford United | 46 | 11 | 16 | 19 | 43 | 57 | -14 | 49 | WLLDL |
24 | Rushden | 46 | 11 | 12 | 23 | 44 | 76 | -32 | 45 | DLLLL |
Season form
Position by Round
Macclesfield
Northampton
Last matches- Macclesfield
Last matches- Northampton
Last matches
| MAC | NOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Scored at FT | 3 3 / 3 | 3 3 / 3 |
| Matches Scored at HT | 2 2 / 3 | 2 2 / 3 |
| Total Goals | 6.00 | 5.00 |
| Average goals scored | 2.00 6 / 3 | 1.67 5 / 3 |
| Scoring efficiency at HT | 67% 2 / 3 | 67% 2 / 3 |
| Scoring efficiency at FT | 100% 3 / 3 | 100% 3 / 3 |
| Goal margin at victories | 1.00 1W | 1.50 2W |
| Both teams scored | 100% 3 / 3 | 67% 2 / 3 |
| At least one goal | 100% 3 / 3 | 100% 3 / 3 |
| Failed to score | 0% 0 / 3 | 0% 0 / 3 |
| Clean sheets | 0% 0 / 3 | 33% 1 / 3 |
Over/Under
| MAC | NOT | |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 93% 1.3 | 87% 1.37 |
| Over 1.5 | 80% 1.3 | 59% 1.37 |
| Over 2.5 | 48% 1.3 | 33% 1.37 |
| Over 3.5 | 37% 1.3 | 24% 1.37 |
| Over 4.5 | 15% 1.3 | 11% 1.37 |
| Over 5.5 | 4% 1.3 | 4% 1.37 |
| Under 0.5 | 7% 1.3 | 13% 1.37 |
| Under 1.5 | 20% 1.3 | 41% 1.37 |
| Under 2.5 | 52% 1.3 | 67% 1.37 |
| Under 3.5 | 63% 1.3 | 76% 1.37 |
| Under 4.5 | 85% 1.3 | 89% 1.37 |
| Under 5.5 | 96% 1.3 | 96% 1.37 |