Matchday 29
|
18
Mar,2013
Limited coverage
Ended
1
:
1
FT1:1
HT1:1
53
/ 100
Overall Form
-
/ 100

Group Table

Playoffs 1-8
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Maccabi Petah Tikva
372110666293773
2
Ra`anana
372010756332370
3
Hapoel Nof Hagalil
371910848301867
4
H Jerusalem
371512104839957
5
H. Petah Tikva
37158144548-353
6
H. Rishon Lezion
371115114443148
7
M. Herzliya
371014133339-644
8
Bnei Lod Rakevet
371013143742-543
Playoffs 9-16
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Yavne
371310144852-449
2
Nazareth
37138164947247
3
Hakoah RG
371210154659-1344
4
M Um El Fahem
371011163944-541
5
Ironi Ashkelon
371011163857-1941
6
Tel Aviv Bat Yam
37913154558-1340
7
Ness Ziona
37716143347-1437
8
Kfar Saba
371011163745-832
National League
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Maccabi Petah Tikva
30178552223059
2
Hapoel Nof Hagalil
30159638231554
3
Ra`anana
301310739261349
4
H. Petah Tikva
3013893835347
5
H Jerusalem
30111273528745
6
H. Rishon Lezion
30101283632442
7
M. Herzliya
30101193129241
8
Bnei Lod Rakevet
3091293030039
9
Yavne
30108123842-438
10
M Um El Fahem
3099122933-436
11
Ness Ziona
30712112937-833
12
Hakoah RG
3098133549-1433
13
Nazareth
3087153641-531
14
Tel Aviv Bat Yam
3079143450-1630
15
Ironi Ashkelon
3079143048-1830
16
Kfar Saba
3098133237-526

Season form

shadow
highlight

100‏%

Form

shadow
highlight

40‏%

Form

Position by Round

Ra`anana
H Jerusalem
Last matches
RANHJE
Matches Scored at FT
3
2
Matches Scored at HT
2
0
Total Goals
8.00
3.00
Average goals scored
2.67
1.00
Scoring efficiency at HT
67‏%
0‏%
Scoring efficiency at FT
100‏%
67‏%
Goal margin at victories
1.67
0.00
Both teams scored
100‏%
67‏%
At least one goal
100‏%
100‏%
Failed to score
0‏%
33‏%
Clean sheets
0‏%
0‏%

Over/Under

RANHJE
Over 0.5
92‏%
1.51
86‏%
1.3
Over 1.5
70‏%
1.51
70‏%
1.3
Over 2.5
46‏%
1.51
49‏%
1.3
Over 3.5
22‏%
1.51
22‏%
1.3
Over 4.5
5‏%
1.51
5‏%
1.3
Over 5.5
5‏%
1.51
3‏%
1.3
Under 0.5
8‏%
1.51
14‏%
1.3
Under 1.5
30‏%
1.51
30‏%
1.3
Under 2.5
54‏%
1.51
51‏%
1.3
Under 3.5
78‏%
1.51
78‏%
1.3
Under 4.5
95‏%
1.51
95‏%
1.3
Under 5.5
95‏%
1.51
97‏%
1.3