Matchday 31
|
11
Dec,2021
15
/ 18
League Position
8
/ 18
7
/ 100
Overall Form
27
/ 100

Group Table

China League 1
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Wuhan Three Towns FC
34254573254879
2
Meizhou Hakka
34243779354475
3
Zhejiang Prof.
34228469284174
4
Chengdu Rongcheng
34218581285371
5
Nantong Zhiyun
34205962303265
6
Shaanxi Chang'an
341711655302562
7
Jiangxi Dingnan United
341511850401056
8
Shenzhen Peng City
34131383427752
9
Kunshan
341312956352151
10
Nanjing City
34129134142-145
11
Zibo Cuju
34109153252-2039
12
Guizhou
34109152656-3039
13
Suzhou Dongwu
34711163653-1732
14
Jiangxi Lushan
3478192968-3929
15
Beijing Sport Uni.
34610183753-1628
16
Liaoning Tieren
3474233062-3225
17
Beijing IT
3435262482-5814
18
X. T. Leopard
3416271684-689
Group A
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Meizhou Hakka
10712189922
2
Zhejiang Prof.
1063121101121
3
Shaanxi Chang'an
10532159618
4
Shenzhen Peng City
1034384413
5
Zibo Cuju
10046518-134
6
X. T. Leopard
10118825-174
Group B
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Chengdu Rongcheng
106311910921
2
Nantong Zhiyun
106221711620
3
Kunshan
103611912715
4
Nanjing City
1034379-213
5
Jiangxi Lushan
102261020-108
6
Beijing Sport Uni.
10037717-103
Group C
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Wuhan Three Towns FC
1062224101420
2
Jiangxi Dingnan United
106131411319
3
Guizhou
1043388015
4
Liaoning Tieren
104151314-113
5
Suzhou Dongwu
103431113-213
6
Beijing IT
101181125-144

Season form

shadow
highlight

40‏%

Form

shadow
highlight

70‏%

Form

Position by Round

Beijing Sport Uni.
Shenzhen Peng City
Last matches
BSUSHE
Matches Scored at FT
2
2
Matches Scored at HT
2
1
Total Goals
4.00
3.00
Average goals scored
1.33
1.00
Scoring efficiency at HT
67‏%
33‏%
Scoring efficiency at FT
67‏%
67‏%
Goal margin at victories
1.00
1.00
Both teams scored
67‏%
33‏%
At least one goal
100‏%
100‏%
Failed to score
33‏%
33‏%
Clean sheets
0‏%
33‏%

Over/Under

BSUSHE
Over 0.5
94‏%
1.09
82‏%
1
Over 1.5
79‏%
1.09
53‏%
1
Over 2.5
53‏%
1.09
26‏%
1
Over 3.5
26‏%
1.09
9‏%
1
Over 4.5
12‏%
1.09
6‏%
1
Over 5.5
0‏%
1.09
3‏%
1
Under 0.5
6‏%
1.09
18‏%
1
Under 1.5
21‏%
1.09
47‏%
1
Under 2.5
47‏%
1.09
74‏%
1
Under 3.5
74‏%
1.09
91‏%
1
Under 4.5
88‏%
1.09
94‏%
1
Under 5.5
100‏%
1.09
97‏%
1