# | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | DIFF | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Ebbsfleet | 46 | 32 | 7 | 7 | 110 | 47 | 63 | 103 | WLWLW |
2 | Dartford | 46 | 25 | 8 | 13 | 82 | 50 | 32 | 83 | LWLWD |
3 | Oxford City | 46 | 21 | 15 | 10 | 83 | 56 | 27 | 78 | LWWDL |
4 | Worthing | 46 | 22 | 12 | 12 | 92 | 72 | 20 | 78 | WWLWW |
5 | Chelmsford | 46 | 23 | 9 | 14 | 68 | 50 | 18 | 78 | LWWDL |
6 | St. Albans | 46 | 22 | 9 | 15 | 72 | 51 | 21 | 75 | LWWLW |
7 | Braintree | 46 | 20 | 14 | 12 | 66 | 55 | 11 | 74 | WWLWD |
8 | Eastbourne | 46 | 22 | 5 | 19 | 74 | 66 | 8 | 71 | WLWLW |
9 | Tonbridge | 46 | 20 | 10 | 16 | 68 | 69 | -1 | 70 | DLDWW |
10 | Havant & Waterlooville | 46 | 19 | 12 | 15 | 80 | 70 | 10 | 69 | DDDWL |
11 | Bath | 46 | 19 | 10 | 17 | 64 | 57 | 7 | 67 | LWLWW |
12 | Farnborough | 46 | 19 | 9 | 18 | 59 | 52 | 7 | 66 | LLWLL |
13 | Chippenham | 46 | 15 | 17 | 14 | 58 | 67 | -9 | 62 | LWDDW |
14 | Taunton | 46 | 17 | 10 | 19 | 50 | 55 | -5 | 61 | LLWLW |
15 | Hemel Hempstead | 46 | 15 | 15 | 16 | 49 | 57 | -8 | 60 | DDLDL |
16 | Welling | 46 | 15 | 14 | 17 | 57 | 63 | -6 | 58 | WLWWW |
17 | Hampton & Richmond | 46 | 15 | 9 | 22 | 59 | 71 | -12 | 54 | LWLLD |
18 | Slough | 46 | 13 | 12 | 21 | 58 | 78 | -20 | 51 | WLWLD |
19 | Weymouth | 46 | 14 | 6 | 26 | 59 | 78 | -19 | 48 | WLWWW |
20 | Dover | 46 | 12 | 12 | 22 | 42 | 68 | -26 | 48 | LLLLL |
21 | Dulwich | 46 | 13 | 9 | 24 | 61 | 89 | -28 | 48 | DWDDL |
22 | Concord Rangers | 46 | 12 | 8 | 26 | 45 | 85 | -40 | 44 | WWDLL |
23 | Cheshunt | 46 | 11 | 10 | 25 | 48 | 74 | -26 | 43 | LLWLL |
24 | Hungerford | 46 | 10 | 10 | 26 | 48 | 72 | -24 | 40 | LWDLL |
Season form
Position by Round
Eastbourne
Oxford City
Last matches- Eastbourne
Last matches- Oxford City
Last matches
| EAS | OXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Scored at FT | 2 2 / 3 | 3 3 / 3 |
| Matches Scored at HT | 1 1 / 3 | 3 3 / 3 |
| Total Goals | 5.00 | 7.00 |
| Average goals scored | 1.67 5 / 3 | 2.33 7 / 3 |
| Scoring efficiency at HT | 33% 1 / 3 | 100% 3 / 3 |
| Scoring efficiency at FT | 67% 2 / 3 | 100% 3 / 3 |
| Goal margin at victories | 2.00 2W | 3.00 2W |
| Both teams scored | 33% 1 / 3 | 33% 1 / 3 |
| At least one goal | 100% 3 / 3 | 100% 3 / 3 |
| Failed to score | 33% 1 / 3 | 0% 0 / 3 |
| Clean sheets | 33% 1 / 3 | 67% 2 / 3 |
Over/Under
| EAS | OXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 98% 1.61 | 96% 1.85 |
| Over 1.5 | 85% 1.61 | 83% 1.85 |
| Over 2.5 | 63% 1.61 | 63% 1.85 |
| Over 3.5 | 30% 1.61 | 40% 1.85 |
| Over 4.5 | 17% 1.61 | 10% 1.85 |
| Over 5.5 | 9% 1.61 | 6% 1.85 |
| Under 0.5 | 2% 1.61 | 4% 1.85 |
| Under 1.5 | 15% 1.61 | 17% 1.85 |
| Under 2.5 | 37% 1.61 | 38% 1.85 |
| Under 3.5 | 70% 1.61 | 60% 1.85 |
| Under 4.5 | 83% 1.61 | 90% 1.85 |
| Under 5.5 | 91% 1.61 | 94% 1.85 |