Table|China League 1
# | Team | P | W | D | L | GF | GA | DIFF | PTS | Form |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Kunshan | 34 | 28 | 5 | 1 | 80 | 19 | 61 | 89 | WLWWW |
2 | Qingdao Hainiu | 34 | 23 | 7 | 4 | 77 | 24 | 53 | 76 | WDWWD |
3 | Nantong Zhiyun | 34 | 21 | 7 | 6 | 62 | 22 | 40 | 70 | LLLLL |
4 | Shijiazhuang Gongfu | 34 | 20 | 6 | 8 | 50 | 31 | 19 | 66 | WWLWL |
5 | Shaanxi Chang'an | 34 | 18 | 8 | 8 | 55 | 32 | 23 | 56 | LWWLL |
6 | Suzhou Dongwu | 34 | 16 | 7 | 11 | 42 | 33 | 9 | 55 | WWWDW |
7 | Shenzhen Peng City | 34 | 18 | 3 | 13 | 40 | 30 | 10 | 51 | WDWLL |
8 | Nanjing City | 34 | 14 | 8 | 12 | 45 | 38 | 7 | 50 | WWWLW |
9 | Qingdao West Coast FC | 34 | 13 | 9 | 12 | 47 | 44 | 3 | 48 | DDWWW |
10 | Jiangxi Dingnan United | 34 | 13 | 7 | 14 | 48 | 48 | 0 | 40 | WLLWW |
11 | Guangxi Pingguo | 34 | 6 | 17 | 11 | 32 | 38 | -6 | 35 | DWDDD |
12 | Liaoning Tieren | 34 | 9 | 8 | 17 | 34 | 53 | -19 | 35 | WWDLL |
13 | Ningbo Professional | 34 | 10 | 4 | 20 | 38 | 65 | -27 | 34 | LLWWW |
14 | Jiangxi Lushan | 34 | 10 | 9 | 15 | 40 | 51 | -11 | 33 | LDLWW |
15 | Zibo Cuju | 34 | 11 | 6 | 17 | 37 | 53 | -16 | 33 | LWLLL |
16 | Beijing Sport Uni. | 34 | 6 | 6 | 22 | 24 | 59 | -35 | 24 | LLLDL |
17 | X. T. Leopard | 34 | 6 | 3 | 25 | 31 | 83 | -52 | 21 | LLLLL |
18 | Beijing IT | 34 | 2 | 4 | 28 | 18 | 77 | -59 | 10 | LLLDW |
Season form
Position by Round
X. T. Leopard
Qingdao Hainiu
Last matches- X. T. Leopard
Last matches- Qingdao Hainiu
Last matches
| XTL | QIN | |
|---|---|---|
| Matches Scored at FT | 2 2 / 3 | 3 3 / 3 |
| Matches Scored at HT | 1 1 / 3 | 2 2 / 3 |
| Total Goals | 2.00 | 11.00 |
| Average goals scored | 0.67 2 / 3 | 3.67 11 / 3 |
| Scoring efficiency at HT | 33% 1 / 3 | 67% 2 / 3 |
| Scoring efficiency at FT | 67% 2 / 3 | 100% 3 / 3 |
| Goal margin at victories | 0.00 0W | 4.00 2W |
| Both teams scored | 67% 2 / 3 | 67% 2 / 3 |
| At least one goal | 100% 3 / 3 | 100% 3 / 3 |
| Failed to score | 33% 1 / 3 | 0% 0 / 3 |
| Clean sheets | 0% 0 / 3 | 33% 1 / 3 |
Over/Under
| XTL | QIN | |
|---|---|---|
| Over 0.5 | 100% 0.91 | 97% 2.26 |
| Over 1.5 | 85% 0.91 | 85% 2.26 |
| Over 2.5 | 71% 0.91 | 50% 2.26 |
| Over 3.5 | 38% 0.91 | 24% 2.26 |
| Over 4.5 | 21% 0.91 | 21% 2.26 |
| Over 5.5 | 12% 0.91 | 15% 2.26 |
| Under 0.5 | 0% 0.91 | 3% 2.26 |
| Under 1.5 | 15% 0.91 | 15% 2.26 |
| Under 2.5 | 29% 0.91 | 50% 2.26 |
| Under 3.5 | 62% 0.91 | 76% 2.26 |
| Under 4.5 | 79% 0.91 | 79% 2.26 |
| Under 5.5 | 88% 0.91 | 85% 2.26 |