Matchday 8
|
25
Oct,2013
27
/ 100
Overall Form
-
/ 100

Group Table

Playoffs 1-8
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Netanya
37249467353281
2
H. Petah Tikva
371810950391164
3
Bnei Lod Rakevet
371612967363160
4
Nazareth
371512105243957
5
Ramat Gan Givatayim
3713131153381552
6
Hapoel Afula
3711161060431749
7
Tel Aviv Bat Yam
371015123945-645
8
Hapoel Nof Hagalil
371111153453-1944
Playoffs 9-16
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Yavne
37149145546951
2
M. Herzliya
3713111349391050
3
H. Rishon Lezion
37148155553250
4
H Jerusalem
371116104739849
5
Hakoah RG
371312124546-148
6
Hapoel Jerusalem
371212135256-448
7
Ironi Ashkelon
3711131355451046
8
M Um El Fahem
37013615139-124-4
National League
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Netanya
30207351262567
2
H. Petah Tikva
3015783830852
3
Bnei Lod Rakevet
301310756292749
4
Nazareth
3012994134745
5
Hapoel Nof Hagalil
30111092934-543
6
Ramat Gan Givatayim
301011940301041
7
Hapoel Afula
30913848321640
8
Tel Aviv Bat Yam
3091383230240
9
M. Herzliya
30109113632439
10
H. Rishon Lezion
30116134347-439
11
Hakoah RG
30119103337-439
12
Hapoel Jerusalem
30109114145-439
13
Ironi Ashkelon
309111047341338
14
H Jerusalem
3081393531437
15
Yavne
30106144345-236
16
M Um El Fahem
30012914111-97-4

Season form

shadow
highlight

20‏%

Form

shadow
highlight

50‏%

Form

No matches available

Next matches - Hakoah RG

No matches available
Last matches
TABHAR
Matches Scored at FT
2
3
Matches Scored at HT
2
1
Total Goals
3.00
8.00
Average goals scored
1.00
2.67
Scoring efficiency at HT
67‏%
33‏%
Scoring efficiency at FT
67‏%
100‏%
Goal margin at victories
0.00
6.00
Both teams scored
67‏%
67‏%
At least one goal
100‏%
100‏%
Failed to score
33‏%
0‏%
Clean sheets
0‏%
33‏%

Over/Under

TABHAR
Over 0.5
86‏%
1.05
86‏%
1.22
Over 1.5
68‏%
1.05
70‏%
1.22
Over 2.5
41‏%
1.05
43‏%
1.22
Over 3.5
24‏%
1.05
22‏%
1.22
Over 4.5
8‏%
1.05
14‏%
1.22
Over 5.5
0‏%
1.05
8‏%
1.22
Under 0.5
14‏%
1.05
14‏%
1.22
Under 1.5
32‏%
1.05
30‏%
1.22
Under 2.5
59‏%
1.05
57‏%
1.22
Under 3.5
76‏%
1.05
78‏%
1.22
Under 4.5
92‏%
1.05
86‏%
1.22
Under 5.5
100‏%
1.05
92‏%
1.22