Kongsberg - Jevnaker | Statistics | StatsHub

06

Aug,2007

shadow

highlight

shadow

highlight

Limited coverage

Ended

1

:

3

FT1:3

HT0:1

-

/ 100

Overall Form

-

/ 100

WDL Direction

WDL Direction

Table|
3. division, Buskerud

#	Team	P	W	D	L	GF	GA	DIFF	PTS	Form
1	Stroemsgodset 2	22	19	1	2	76	21	55	58	WWWWWWDL Direction
2	Birkebeineren	22	13	5	4	66	41	25	44	WWLWWWDL Direction
3	Aaskollen	22	14	2	6	65	40	25	44	WWLWWWDL Direction
4	Aassiden	22	12	2	8	56	32	24	38	LLWWDWDL Direction
5	Kongsberg	22	9	6	7	57	40	17	33	DWWWDWDL Direction
6	Konnerud	22	10	3	9	34	37	-3	33	LLLDWWDL Direction
7	Jevnaker	22	9	3	10	60	51	9	30	LLWLLWDL Direction
8	Hoenefoss 2	22	8	4	10	46	40	6	28	DWLLLWDL Direction
9	Mjoendalen 2	22	8	4	10	43	51	-8	28	LWLLLWDL Direction
10	Solberg	22	5	4	13	42	70	-28	19	LLWWLWDL Direction
11	Svelvik	22	4	2	16	29	83	-54	14	WLLDLWDL Direction
12	Ros	22	3	0	19	23	91	-68	9	WLLLWWDL Direction

Season form

Kongsberg

shadow

highlight

80‏%

Form

D

+4

W

+1

W

+2

W

D

WDL Direction

Jevnaker

shadow

highlight

20‏%

Form

L

-2

L

-5

+4

W

L

-1

L

-1

WDL Direction

Next matches - Kongsberg

No matches available

FixturesFixtures

Next matches - Jevnaker

No matches available

FixturesFixtures

Last matches

	KON	JEV
Matches Scored at FT	3 3 / 3	3 3 / 3
Matches Scored at HT	2 2 / 3	1 1 / 3
Total Goals	6.00	10.00
Average goals scored	2.00 6 / 3	3.33 10 / 3
Scoring efficiency at HT	67‏% 2 / 3	33‏% 1 / 3
Scoring efficiency at FT	100‏% 3 / 3	100‏% 3 / 3
Goal margin at victories	1.50 2W	4.00 1W
Both teams scored	67‏% 2 / 3	67‏% 2 / 3
At least one goal	100‏% 3 / 3	100‏% 3 / 3
Failed to score	0‏% 0 / 3	0‏% 0 / 3
Clean sheets	33‏% 1 / 3	33‏% 1 / 3

Over/Under

	KON	JEV
Over 0.5	100‏% 2.59	100‏% 2.73
Over 1.5	100‏% 2.59	100‏% 2.73
Over 2.5	77‏% 2.59	77‏% 2.73
Over 3.5	64‏% 2.59	73‏% 2.73
Over 4.5	41‏% 2.59	50‏% 2.73
Over 5.5	27‏% 2.59	41‏% 2.73
Under 0.5	0‏% 2.59	0‏% 2.73
Under 1.5	0‏% 2.59	0‏% 2.73
Under 2.5	23‏% 2.59	23‏% 2.73
Under 3.5	36‏% 2.59	27‏% 2.73
Under 4.5	59‏% 2.59	50‏% 2.73
Under 5.5	73‏% 2.59	59‏% 2.73