Quarterfinals
|
20
May,2014
Limited coverage
Ended
2
:
0
FT2:0
HT0:0
-
/ -
League Position
-
/ -
33
/ 100
Overall Form
-
/ 100

Group Table

Beyaz Group
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Giresun
34207755332267
2
Goztepe Izmir
341812451272466
3
Hatayspor
34189750302063
4
Malatya
341610850341658
5
Kartalspor
341610849331658
6
Pendik
341511843311256
7
Inegol
341591046331354
8
Aydinspor
341113104338546
9
Turgutlu
341013114343043
10
Gumushanespor
34913123132-140
11
Kirklareli
34911143451-1738
12
Tokatspor
34108163957-1838
13
Konya
34812143139-836
14
Sariyer
34616123848-1034
15
Tarsus
34712153250-1833
16
Dardanelspor
34614142940-1132
17
Gaziosmanpasa
34513163352-1928
18
Cankiri Bld
34413171743-2625
Kirmizi Group
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Altinordu
34256377235481
2
Alanyaspor
34226676354172
3
Ankaragucu
34225777304771
4
Bandirma
34187968482061
5
Amed
3417984031960
6
Buyukcekmece
34157124143-252
7
Nazilli
341311104139250
8
Mamak
34138135043747
9
Korfez SK
34135165556-144
10
Ofspor
341110134554-943
11
Pazar
34133184055-1542
12
Altay
34119145052-242
13
Bayrampasa
34118153756-1941
14
Golbasispor
34114194353-1037
15
Iskenderun Demir
34910153446-1237
16
Eyupspor
3499163661-2536
17
Gungoren
3476212754-2727
18
Bozuyukspor
3425272179-5811

Season form

shadow
highlight

80‏%

Form

shadow
highlight

50‏%

Form

Position by Round

Goztepe Izmir
Kartalspor
Last matches
GOZKAR
Matches Scored at FT
2
1
Matches Scored at HT
0
1
Total Goals
5.00
5.00
Average goals scored
1.67
1.67
Scoring efficiency at HT
0‏%
33‏%
Scoring efficiency at FT
67‏%
33‏%
Goal margin at victories
2.00
3.00
Both teams scored
33‏%
33‏%
At least one goal
100‏%
100‏%
Failed to score
33‏%
67‏%
Clean sheets
33‏%
0‏%

Over/Under

GOZKAR
Over 0.5
89‏%
1.5
97‏%
1.36
Over 1.5
66‏%
1.5
67‏%
1.36
Over 2.5
32‏%
1.5
28‏%
1.36
Over 3.5
24‏%
1.5
17‏%
1.36
Over 4.5
13‏%
1.5
11‏%
1.36
Over 5.5
5‏%
1.5
8‏%
1.36
Under 0.5
11‏%
1.5
3‏%
1.36
Under 1.5
34‏%
1.5
33‏%
1.36
Under 2.5
68‏%
1.5
72‏%
1.36
Under 3.5
76‏%
1.5
83‏%
1.36
Under 4.5
87‏%
1.5
89‏%
1.36
Under 5.5
95‏%
1.5
92‏%
1.36