Matchday 4
|
16
Feb,2008
Limited coverage
Ended
1
:
2
FT1:2
HT1:0
-
/ -
League Position
-
/ -
87
/ 100
Overall Form
87
/ 100

Group Table

Group A Part 1
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Fehervar Szekesfeh.
6312159610
2
Ujpest Budapest
63121514110
3
Budapest Honved
62221216-48
4
Paksi
62041114-36
Group B Part 1
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Zalaegerszeg
65101871116
2
REAC
6222141228
3
Siofok
6213912-37
4
Kaposvari
6024616-102
Group C Part 1
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Debreceni
6321106411
2
Diosgyori
631266010
3
Nyiregyhaza
63038629
4
Vasas
6114511-64
Group D Part 1
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
ETO Gyor
6402138512
2
Tatabanya
6312139410
3
MTK Budapest
621389-17
4
Sopron
6204816-86
Group A Part 2
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
ETO Gyor
64201661014
2
Zalaegerszeg
53201631311
3
Sopron
5104415-113
4
Tatabanya
6105719-123
Group B Part 2
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Paksi
65011610615
2
Siofok
6303151329
3
Kaposvari
6303111109
4
Fehervar Szekesfeh.
6105715-83
Group C Part 2
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Debreceni
6411108213
2
REAC
6312910-110
3
Budapest Honved
622213858
4
Nyiregyhaza
6024410-62
Group D Part 2
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
MTK Budapest
6420126614
2
Ujpest Budapest
630314959
3
Vasas
6213916-77
4
Diosgyori
6114812-44

Season form

shadow
highlight

20‏%

Form

shadow
highlight

60‏%

Form

Position by Round

Tatabanya
Zalaegerszeg
Last matches
TATZAL
Matches Scored at FT
3
1
Matches Scored at HT
1
0
Total Goals
6.00
3.00
Average goals scored
2.00
1.00
Scoring efficiency at HT
33‏%
0‏%
Scoring efficiency at FT
100‏%
33‏%
Goal margin at victories
3.00
3.00
Both teams scored
67‏%
0‏%
At least one goal
100‏%
67‏%
Failed to score
0‏%
67‏%
Clean sheets
33‏%
67‏%

Over/Under

TATZAL
Over 0.5
93‏%
1.57
94‏%
2.5
Over 1.5
86‏%
1.57
94‏%
2.5
Over 2.5
86‏%
1.57
61‏%
2.5
Over 3.5
50‏%
1.57
33‏%
2.5
Over 4.5
36‏%
1.57
22‏%
2.5
Over 5.5
14‏%
1.57
11‏%
2.5
Under 0.5
7‏%
1.57
6‏%
2.5
Under 1.5
14‏%
1.57
6‏%
2.5
Under 2.5
14‏%
1.57
39‏%
2.5
Under 3.5
50‏%
1.57
67‏%
2.5
Under 4.5
64‏%
1.57
78‏%
2.5
Under 5.5
86‏%
1.57
89‏%
2.5