Matchday 5
|
20
Feb,2008
Limited coverage
Ended
1
:
1
FT1:1
HT0:1
-
/ -
League Position
-
/ -
87
/ 100
Overall Form
67
/ 100

Group Table

Group A Part 1
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Fehervar Szekesfeh.
6312159610
2
Ujpest Budapest
63121514110
3
Budapest Honved
62221216-48
4
Paksi
62041114-36
Group B Part 1
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Zalaegerszeg
65101871116
2
REAC
6222141228
3
Siofok
6213912-37
4
Kaposvari
6024616-102
Group C Part 1
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Debreceni
6321106411
2
Diosgyori
631266010
3
Nyiregyhaza
63038629
4
Vasas
6114511-64
Group D Part 1
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
ETO Gyor
6402138512
2
Tatabanya
6312139410
3
MTK Budapest
621389-17
4
Sopron
6204816-86
Group A Part 2
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
ETO Gyor
64201661014
2
Zalaegerszeg
53201631311
3
Sopron
5104415-113
4
Tatabanya
6105719-123
Group B Part 2
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Paksi
65011610615
2
Siofok
6303151329
3
Kaposvari
6303111109
4
Fehervar Szekesfeh.
6105715-83
Group C Part 2
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Debreceni
6411108213
2
REAC
6312910-110
3
Budapest Honved
622213858
4
Nyiregyhaza
6024410-62
Group D Part 2
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
MTK Budapest
6420126614
2
Ujpest Budapest
630314959
3
Vasas
6213916-77
4
Diosgyori
6114812-44

Season form

shadow
highlight

60‏%

Form

shadow
highlight

70‏%

Form

Position by Round

Zalaegerszeg
ETO Gyor
Last matches
ZALGYO
Matches Scored at FT
1
2
Matches Scored at HT
0
2
Total Goals
3.00
4.00
Average goals scored
1.00
1.33
Scoring efficiency at HT
0‏%
67‏%
Scoring efficiency at FT
33‏%
67‏%
Goal margin at victories
3.00
2.00
Both teams scored
0‏%
0‏%
At least one goal
67‏%
100‏%
Failed to score
67‏%
33‏%
Clean sheets
67‏%
67‏%

Over/Under

ZALGYO
Over 0.5
94‏%
2.5
100‏%
2
Over 1.5
94‏%
2.5
95‏%
2
Over 2.5
61‏%
2.5
60‏%
2
Over 3.5
33‏%
2.5
40‏%
2
Over 4.5
22‏%
2.5
30‏%
2
Over 5.5
11‏%
2.5
5‏%
2
Under 0.5
6‏%
2.5
0‏%
2
Under 1.5
6‏%
2.5
5‏%
2
Under 2.5
39‏%
2.5
40‏%
2
Under 3.5
67‏%
2.5
60‏%
2
Under 4.5
78‏%
2.5
70‏%
2
Under 5.5
89‏%
2.5
95‏%
2