Matchday 24
|
07
Mar,2009
Limited coverage
Ended
1
:
3
FT1:3
40
/ 100
Overall Form
-
/ 100

Group Table

Oberliga Niedersachsen West
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Oldenburg
5540871444698128
2
Havelse
55331391185563112
3
Nordhorn
55345161309337107
4
Meppen
54261513131824993
5
Rehden
55231022116922479
6
Bavenstedt
552310229594179
7
Rothenfelde
55211222103110-775
8
Langenhagen
5518142392104-1268
9
Oldenburg
552082789106-1768
10
Hameln
552082796114-1868
11
Leer
43198168980965
12
Osnabruck II
541713248395-1264
13
Hildesheim
3499164453-936
14
Arminia Hannover
34105195781-2435
15
Heesseler SV
341032165117-5233
16
Pewsum
3493224281-3930
17
TUS Lingen
3493223688-5230
18
SV Wilhelmshaven II
3477203675-3928
Oberliga Niedersachsen East
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Goslar
32262486325480
2
Osterholz-S
32223783364769
3
Luneburg
32204880443664
4
Heeslingen
32186888553360
5
Ottersberg
32177868442458
6
Gifhorn
321661067481954
7
Drochtersen/Assel
321661059471254
8
Northeim
32137125657-146
9
Olper
321110115049143
10
Braunschweig
321010124955-640
11
Stade
32116154145-439
12
Bornreihe
32105175277-2535
13
TuS Celle
32103196584-1933
14
SCW Gottingen
3283214885-3727
15
Rotenburger SV
3283214194-5327
16
Vorsfelde
3265213571-3623
17
VfL Maschen
3254233782-4519

Season form

shadow
highlight

50‏%

Form

shadow
highlight

60‏%

Form

Position by Round

Braunschweig
Goslar

Next matches - Braunschweig

No matches available

Next matches - Goslar

No matches available
Last matches
BRAGOS
Matches Scored at FT
2
2
Matches Scored at HT
0
0
Total Goals
9.00
5.00
Average goals scored
3.00
1.67
Scoring efficiency at HT
0‏%
0‏%
Scoring efficiency at FT
67‏%
67‏%
Goal margin at victories
4.00
1.50
Both teams scored
33‏%
67‏%
At least one goal
100‏%
100‏%
Failed to score
33‏%
33‏%
Clean sheets
33‏%
0‏%

Over/Under

BRAGOS
Over 0.5
94‏%
1.5
100‏%
2.6
Over 1.5
79‏%
1.5
80‏%
2.6
Over 2.5
53‏%
1.5
74‏%
2.6
Over 3.5
41‏%
1.5
46‏%
2.6
Over 4.5
24‏%
1.5
34‏%
2.6
Over 5.5
15‏%
1.5
14‏%
2.6
Under 0.5
6‏%
1.5
0‏%
2.6
Under 1.5
21‏%
1.5
20‏%
2.6
Under 2.5
47‏%
1.5
26‏%
2.6
Under 3.5
59‏%
1.5
54‏%
2.6
Under 4.5
76‏%
1.5
66‏%
2.6
Under 5.5
85‏%
1.5
86‏%
2.6