Matchday 33
|
17
May,2009
Limited coverage
Ended
4
:
0
FT4:0
40
/ 100
Overall Form
-
/ 100

Group Table

Oberliga Niedersachsen West
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Oldenburg
5540871444698128
2
Havelse
55331391185563112
3
Nordhorn
55345161309337107
4
Meppen
54261513131824993
5
Rehden
55231022116922479
6
Bavenstedt
552310229594179
7
Rothenfelde
55211222103110-775
8
Langenhagen
5518142392104-1268
9
Oldenburg
552082789106-1768
10
Hameln
552082796114-1868
11
Leer
43198168980965
12
Osnabruck II
541713248395-1264
13
Hildesheim
3499164453-936
14
Arminia Hannover
34105195781-2435
15
Heesseler SV
341032165117-5233
16
Pewsum
3493224281-3930
17
TUS Lingen
3493223688-5230
18
SV Wilhelmshaven II
3477203675-3928
Oberliga Niedersachsen East
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Goslar
32262486325480
2
Osterholz-S
32223783364769
3
Luneburg
32204880443664
4
Heeslingen
32186888553360
5
Ottersberg
32177868442458
6
Gifhorn
321661067481954
7
Drochtersen/Assel
321661059471254
8
Northeim
32137125657-146
9
Olper
321110115049143
10
Braunschweig
321010124955-640
11
Stade
32116154145-439
12
Bornreihe
32105175277-2535
13
TuS Celle
32103196584-1933
14
SCW Gottingen
3283214885-3727
15
Rotenburger SV
3283214194-5327
16
Vorsfelde
3265213571-3623
17
VfL Maschen
3254233782-4519

Season form

shadow
highlight

60‏%

Form

shadow
highlight

20‏%

Form

Position by Round

Gifhorn
TuS Celle

Next matches - Gifhorn

No matches available

Next matches - TuS Celle

No matches available
Last matches
GIFCFC
Matches Scored at FT
3
2
Matches Scored at HT
0
0
Total Goals
8.00
6.00
Average goals scored
2.67
2.00
Scoring efficiency at HT
0‏%
0‏%
Scoring efficiency at FT
100‏%
67‏%
Goal margin at victories
3.00
5.00
Both teams scored
67‏%
33‏%
At least one goal
100‏%
100‏%
Failed to score
0‏%
33‏%
Clean sheets
33‏%
33‏%

Over/Under

GIFCFC
Over 0.5
100‏%
2.03
97‏%
2
Over 1.5
94‏%
2.03
88‏%
2
Over 2.5
65‏%
2.03
85‏%
2
Over 3.5
50‏%
2.03
74‏%
2
Over 4.5
26‏%
2.03
47‏%
2
Over 5.5
9‏%
2.03
32‏%
2
Under 0.5
0‏%
2.03
3‏%
2
Under 1.5
6‏%
2.03
12‏%
2
Under 2.5
35‏%
2.03
15‏%
2
Under 3.5
50‏%
2.03
26‏%
2
Under 4.5
74‏%
2.03
53‏%
2
Under 5.5
91‏%
2.03
68‏%
2