Matchday 2
|
30
Dec,2016
Limited coverage
Ended
0
:
1
FT0:1
HT0:0
-
/ 100
Overall Form
67
/ 100

Group Table

Playoffs 1-8
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Netanya
372213280413970
2
Hapoel Acre
371711958411762
3
Tel Aviv Bat Yam
3716111067392859
4
Ramat Gan Givatayim
371510125346755
5
Hapoel Jerusalem
37158145556-153
6
H. Petah Tikva
371411125551452
7
Bnei Lod Rakevet
37138164962-1347
8
Nazareth
371015124552-745
Playoffs 9-16
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Nir Ramat Hasharon
371211143842-447
2
H. Rishon Lezion
371113133839-146
3
Hapoel Afula
37918105559-445
4
Ironi Nesher
37916122635-943
5
M. Herzliya
371013144555-1043
6
Hapoel Nof Hagalil
37913153253-2140
7
H Jerusalem
37911172944-1538
8
M. Shaaraim
37812174050-1036
National League
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Netanya
301712165323354
2
Hapoel Acre
30159650302054
3
Ramat Gan Givatayim
30157846281852
4
Tel Aviv Bat Yam
301111849351444
5
H. Petah Tikva
30119103938142
6
Hapoel Jerusalem
30126124046-642
7
Nazareth
3091383730740
8
Bnei Lod Rakevet
30116133952-1339
9
Hapoel Afula
3081484246-438
10
H. Rishon Lezion
30812102829-136
11
M. Herzliya
30811113744-735
12
Ironi Nesher
30713102232-1034
13
Nir Ramat Hasharon
3089132738-1133
14
Hapoel Nof Hagalil
30710132543-1831
15
H Jerusalem
3078152238-1629
16
M. Shaaraim
30610142835-728

Season form

shadow
highlight

50‏%

Form

shadow
highlight

50‏%

Form

Last matches
HJEMHE
Matches Scored at FT
3
1
Matches Scored at HT
1
1
Total Goals
3.00
3.00
Average goals scored
1.00
1.00
Scoring efficiency at HT
33‏%
33‏%
Scoring efficiency at FT
100‏%
33‏%
Goal margin at victories
0.00
1.00
Both teams scored
100‏%
33‏%
At least one goal
100‏%
100‏%
Failed to score
0‏%
67‏%
Clean sheets
0‏%
0‏%

Over/Under

HJEMHE
Over 0.5
89‏%
0.78
92‏%
1.22
Over 1.5
62‏%
0.78
78‏%
1.22
Over 2.5
30‏%
0.78
43‏%
1.22
Over 3.5
11‏%
0.78
24‏%
1.22
Over 4.5
5‏%
0.78
16‏%
1.22
Over 5.5
0‏%
0.78
8‏%
1.22
Under 0.5
11‏%
0.78
8‏%
1.22
Under 1.5
38‏%
0.78
22‏%
1.22
Under 2.5
70‏%
0.78
57‏%
1.22
Under 3.5
89‏%
0.78
76‏%
1.22
Under 4.5
95‏%
0.78
84‏%
1.22
Under 5.5
100‏%
0.78
92‏%
1.22