Matchday 24
|
17
Feb,2017
Limited coverage
Ended
0
:
2
FT0:2
HT0:1
67
/ 100
Overall Form
73
/ 100

Group Table

Playoffs 1-8
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Netanya
372213280413970
2
Hapoel Acre
371711958411762
3
Tel Aviv Bat Yam
3716111067392859
4
Ramat Gan Givatayim
371510125346755
5
Hapoel Jerusalem
37158145556-153
6
H. Petah Tikva
371411125551452
7
Bnei Lod Rakevet
37138164962-1347
8
Nazareth
371015124552-745
Playoffs 9-16
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Nir Ramat Hasharon
371211143842-447
2
H. Rishon Lezion
371113133839-146
3
Hapoel Afula
37918105559-445
4
Ironi Nesher
37916122635-943
5
M. Herzliya
371013144555-1043
6
Hapoel Nof Hagalil
37913153253-2140
7
H Jerusalem
37911172944-1538
8
M. Shaaraim
37812174050-1036
National League
#
Team
P
W
D
L
GF
GA
DIFF
PTS
Form
1
Netanya
301712165323354
2
Hapoel Acre
30159650302054
3
Ramat Gan Givatayim
30157846281852
4
Tel Aviv Bat Yam
301111849351444
5
H. Petah Tikva
30119103938142
6
Hapoel Jerusalem
30126124046-642
7
Nazareth
3091383730740
8
Bnei Lod Rakevet
30116133952-1339
9
Hapoel Afula
3081484246-438
10
H. Rishon Lezion
30812102829-136
11
M. Herzliya
30811113744-735
12
Ironi Nesher
30713102232-1034
13
Nir Ramat Hasharon
3089132738-1133
14
Hapoel Nof Hagalil
30710132543-1831
15
H Jerusalem
3078152238-1629
16
M. Shaaraim
30610142835-728

Season form

shadow
highlight

30‏%

Form

shadow
highlight

50‏%

Form

Last matches
MANMHE
Matches Scored at FT
2
1
Matches Scored at HT
0
1
Total Goals
2.00
3.00
Average goals scored
0.67
1.00
Scoring efficiency at HT
0‏%
33‏%
Scoring efficiency at FT
67‏%
33‏%
Goal margin at victories
0.00
1.00
Both teams scored
67‏%
33‏%
At least one goal
100‏%
100‏%
Failed to score
33‏%
67‏%
Clean sheets
0‏%
0‏%

Over/Under

MANMHE
Over 0.5
86‏%
1.22
92‏%
1.22
Over 1.5
78‏%
1.22
78‏%
1.22
Over 2.5
43‏%
1.22
43‏%
1.22
Over 3.5
30‏%
1.22
24‏%
1.22
Over 4.5
11‏%
1.22
16‏%
1.22
Over 5.5
8‏%
1.22
8‏%
1.22
Under 0.5
14‏%
1.22
8‏%
1.22
Under 1.5
22‏%
1.22
22‏%
1.22
Under 2.5
57‏%
1.22
57‏%
1.22
Under 3.5
70‏%
1.22
76‏%
1.22
Under 4.5
89‏%
1.22
84‏%
1.22
Under 5.5
92‏%
1.22
92‏%
1.22